(continued)
Reader appreciates non-scientific explanation for DGR

May 31, 2015

Letters

 

To Comment on this article  Click Here

To the Editor:

The recent article is a very good explanation. Thank you for your time and effort to keep the public informed, and to summarize the details in a way that a non- scientist would understand.

 (To read the article referred to Click Here)

Hopefully, a few of the borderline anti-group will read the articles and have their fears put to rest.

Unfortunately, there are many head strong Anti-people who probably will not even read the whole article because it contains what they donít want to hear. Logic.

 All of us who agree with the JPR findings, should make sure at least one 'Anti' that we know reads this and the previous article.

(To read the previous article, Click Here )

 It is understandable that some people, aware of the pipeline disaster in California, would be leery of big business and risks taken to save money. (The pipeline had no shut off valves.) What they do not understand is that, where nuclear energy in Canada is concerned, our process takes into account that big business will not singly, ever have the ability to cut corners.

Jim Reid.

 

Click the orange arrow to read the second column

Canadian Community News, and thereby its subsidiaries, does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. All comments must be signed and are published at the discretion of the editor


Survey  Saugeen Times Read More
Survey Kincardine Read More
Survey  Walkerton News Read More

Click on the ads for more information

 
for world news, books, sports, movies ...

Saturday, May 30, 2015