|
Letters To Comment on this article Click Here |
||
|
It is hard to understand US gun laws and in particular Arizona's laws. I thought that contrasting Arizona laws with the US Military regulations and training might not clear up the mystery, but show how strange the whole thing is. The shooting in Arizona certainly brought out a lot of discussion in the media and neighbour to neighbour here in Canada. One interesting TV interview was on CNN's The Parker Spitzer Show. They interviewed gun expert Alan Korwin, author of "The Arizona Gun Owner's Guide" and owner and operator of Gunlaws.com, He is National Rifle Association Member. The NRA is the powerful gun lobby group that has tried to block any and all gun control legislation in the US. Their most famous of which was the result of the assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan. This resulted from the crippling of Reagan aid James Brady and the act was named after as the Brady Handgun Provision Act. The NRA fought this act with millions in lobby and advertising money as it does for every change proposed to limit guns. Mr. Korwin was asked about the shooting spree in Tucson. He maintained that having more guns in the public hands is better and limiting ammunition in the clips of automatic weapons is dangerous. His thoughts on this were organized around the idea of running out of ammunition, when the bad guy has plenty. More guns in the 'right' hands is advocated by the NRA. Their theory is that an armed populace protects itself against the criminal and the madman by engendering fear in them. The idea is simple. If they know we are armed, they will hesitate to perpetrate a crime. Correspondingly, they advocate the death penalty for murder as a deterrent Even though Mr. Korwin was from Arizona, he did not realize that two other young men at the site of the horrific crime were in fact armed. One of them was interviewed on the Parker-Spitzer show at another time. He was in a Walgreen Drugstore at the Mall, when he heard gunshots. He rushed outside and tried to assist. While doing so he saw another person with a gun. They eyed each other, both with guns near ready. For some reason, they decided not to fire at each other, but to go about helping the victims and helping to sit on the killer. Three young men near the same age all with guns. One guy was the bad guy and the two gun carrying citizens did not shoot each other or others in the melee. They did not help in the initial shooting, which happened very quickly. If the killer had not been restrained by others, it is hard to imagine what would have happened. The young man interviewed said he always carries a gun and goes to the range often. What training he has had is unknown. The Military in the United States and Guns It's interesting to contrast how guns are handled in the military in the United States. Here is a brief summary of gun training and use in the United States Marine Corps:
Arizona Gun Laws The Arizona gun laws have been weakened over the past few years culminating in the July 29, 2010 law change that did the following: The change is part of a broad weapons law by state Sen. Russell Pearce passed by the state Legislature in April that eases restrictions on concealed carry and stiffens penalties for committing a crime while carrying a concealed weapon. The law is one of many passed by the state Legislature this past session that go into effect today. Arizona joins Alaska and Vermont as the only states to allow concealed weapons without a permit. However, the impact of the law is likely to be different in Arizona than those states because Arizona's population is much larger and because the state has major metropolitan areas. "It's one thing to carry a loaded weapon in public when your closest neighbor is a mile or 5 miles away," said Brian Malte, director of state legislation for the Brady Campaign, an interest group that lobbies for gun regulations. "It's a very different situation when you're in a densely-populated urban environment." But that lack of precedent makes it difficult to predict the law's impact. Opponents say that without permitting and training, individuals might place themselves in situations where they might break the law or hurt themselves and others. Proponents say that concealed carry is not substantially different from open carry, which the state already allows without a permit, and that the new law simply lets law-abiding citizens carry weapons in whatever way is most comfortable. The law has already created changes for the firearms community, local businesses and police departments. It has also galvanized gun-rights groups to seek further deregulation. Source Arizona Repulic Submitted by Mike Sterling Southampton |
Scrolling stops when you move your mouse inside the scroll area.
You can click on the ads for more
|
||
for
world news,
books, sports, movies ...Wednesday, January 19, 2011 |