|
a lovely building. leave it
alone. other needs are more importNT |
|
And the house at the Airport |
|
getting to old costing $ to keep
up .cost alot more if it had to be brought up to
fad standards get rid of it sell off the old
westario building space just be given away at
a cost to taxpayers . |
|
I believe that the building
should be sold and the money used to off set the
tax increase or used to pay for some of the
upgrades to other town owned buildings. I
know the BIA has been using space in the
building but there should be a place for them to
use in another municipal building. Thanks
for taking my comments. Have a great day. |
|
I don't know |
|
I love that old building. It
represents Kincardine in yesteryear. I know it
would take a lot of money to revamp it for
renting.But it should be long to Kincardine. |
|
If it is costing the Municipality
money to run it each month we should sell it. |
|
It has such character such a
rich historical past.The old post office and
Victoria Park are part of the wonderful unique
flavour of Kincardine. Richard Johnston |
|
It is a lovely well built
structure and it can't be replaced. It is part
of our history and should be maintained as close
to original as possible. |
|
It is mainly being used as a
private business not a municipal facility.
Let the users pay the maintenance costs if they
want a prime downtown location. |
|
It is one of the more interesting
buildings in town. Fix up and make it useful |
|
It should be restored and used
for public purposes. |
|
It will help pay the $90 000.00
the town is going to defer on the Walker
House. |
|
it would be money that can be put
into the Municipalities much needed projects |
|
It's a heritage building and
should be maintained as such with reliable
tenants helping to offset/pay for costs. |
|
It's a historical part of
downtown. Why would the present council imagine
that it is a cash cow? |
|
Kincardine needs to get it's
fiscal situation under control. A compound
tax increase of 22.6 % over two years is
rediculous.Future growth will be limited because
of high taxes. GRants and dividends from Hydro
Bruce Power Bruce Telecom should keep taxes
lower than elsewhere? The upkeep of these
old buildings and minimal income from rent will
break Kincardine. |
|
Maybe they can be used as
souvener stores. As if we don't have enough in
town. No grocery store downtown but lots of
souveners |
|
Not even sure what it is
prewently being used for. |
|
only short sited pooliticians
would get rid of a valuable local landmark
with the view that this building has and then
pay rent for a tourist office out in the middle
of nowhere |
|
Part of the town's heritage; Keep
It! |
|
repairs in the future will be
costly. Get rid of it. |
|
SOME WOULD WANT TO CHANGE THE
ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL. WE HAVE LOST ENOUGH |
|
taxes are to high we
have to drive to other towns and cities to shop you
can't even buy a suit. there is nothing here . |
|
The building has been a drain on
taxpayers money for many years and will require too
much renovation to make it accessible. Sell it and let
a private company try to make a go of it. And
while you're at it sell the airport too. |
|
the building has tenants tenants
pay rent and rent is money into the pubic
coffers. How would we replace that source of long term
revenue? Hell we can't even keep a Fish Derby running
without sinking money into it and we are right next to
the lake! If the building loses money dump it but if
it is making money why sell? |
|
The Municipality needs to
maintain control of this historic feature
within our downtown. Preserving the character of
the building offers value to our downtown.
Would hate to see it demolished and replaced
with a new structure. |
|
they are both an eye sore and a
money pit |
|
This is useful to all people in
Kincardine. |
|
With our taxes going up 22% in 2
years we obviously cannot afford to maintain
all these buildings the town owns. |
|
yes to old to keepup |
|
YES THERE IS NOTHING TO BE MADE
BY KEEPING IT. IT S JUST A BILL OF
EXSPENCE |